Friday, November 17, 2017

Currently Proposed Tax Plan breakdown

Here's a breakdown of the proposed tax plan that would affect the Real Estate Market. Officially known as the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" Bill which passed the House on 11/16/17 and now sits in the Senate for Approval. Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 227 - 205.
Proposed tax plan rates and income brackets
Tax Rate - Single Filer - Married Filing Jointly Filers
12% Up to $45,000 - Up to $90,000
25% $45,001 to $200,000 - $90,001 to $260,000
35% $200,001 to $500,000 - $260,001 to $1 million
39.6% More than $500,000 - More than $1 million
Standard deduction for married couples to be $24K, currently $12,700. For unmarried individuals $12K, currently $6,530. It would also repeal the alternative minimum tax.
Some of the changes to take place that affect the Real Estate Market:
1. Slash the mortgage interest deduction in half from $1 million to $500,000. 2. Elimination of the deduction for state and local income or sales taxes not paid or accrued in a trade or business,
3. Property tax deduction will be capped at $10,000
4. Requirement for taxpayers to live in a home for five of the past eight years in order to exclude capital gains from the sale of that house. Currently, it’s two of the past five years.
5. The limit on the capital gains exclusion would stay at $500,000 for joint filers and $250,000 for singles but would begin phasing out for taxpayers with incomes above $500,000 for joint filers and $250,000 for single filers. You could use the exclusion only once every five years instead of once every two years.
6. no more deductions for moving expenses
7. no more property and casualty write-offs
4. The proposal will double the estate tax exemption to roughly $11 million, from $5.49 million, meaning families can avoid paying taxes on large inheritance. And it eventually repeals the estate tax altogether, phasing it out entirely in six years
Business Changes:
1. a permanent cut to the corporate tax rate to 20% from 35% —
2. Small businesses and sole proprietors will be taxed at 25%
3. allows increased expensing of the costs of certain property
It also plans to expand the child tax credit to $1,600 from $1,000 and add a $300 credit for each parent and non-child dependent, such as older family members, though that credit would expire after five years. Those making less than $24,000 will pay no income tax.
From the Government website:
Summary of the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act"
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses.
With respect to individuals, the bill:
replaces the seven existing tax brackets (10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, and 39.6%) with four brackets (12%, 25%, 35%, and 39.6%),
increases the standard deduction,
repeals the deduction for personal exemptions,
establishes a 25% maximum rate on the business income of individuals,
increases the child tax credit and establishes a new family tax credit,
repeals the overall limitation on certain itemized deductions,
limits the mortgage interest deduction for debt incurred after November 2, 2017, to mortgages of up to $500,000 (currently $1 million),
repeals the deduction for state and local income or sales taxes not paid or accrued in a trade or business,
repeals the deduction for medical expenses,
consolidates and repeals several education-related deductions and credits,
repeals the alternative minimum tax, and
repeals the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes in six years.
For businesses, the bill:
reduces the corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 20% rate (25% for personal services corporations),
allows increased expensing of the costs of certain property,
limits the deductibility of net interest expenses to 30% of the business's adjusted taxable income,
repeals the work opportunity tax credit,
terminates the exclusion for interest on private activity bonds,
modifies or repeals various energy-related deductions and credits,
modifies the taxation of foreign income, and
imposes an excise tax on certain payments from domestic corporations to related foreign corporations.
The bill also repeals or modifies several additional credits and deductions for individuals and businesses.

Monday, November 13, 2017

UCLA Students announce an attempt to create their own City Council amidst housing disputes

The proposed 20 story student housing facility on the corner of Gayley and LeConte has been blocked by the Westwood Neighborhood Council prompting UCLA Students to split from the Council and attempt creating their own. 

This is an ongoing argument that almost every neighborhood fights with now, "density".  The Westwood Neighborhood Council  approves having the 20 story proposed building divided among four existing UCLA sites, but students object stating that would hinder any future development if ever needed by utilizing all four sites.

Students rights versus homeowner rights - which one to prevail?  One item to consider is that The Wilshire Corridor also knows as the Golden Mile, is a two mile stretch of luxury residential high rises on Wilshire Boulevard in Westwood with buildings over 20 stories.

Many homeowners feel the students are "transient" therefore, they come and go after college completion, therefore their rights don't hold as much value as a homeowner paying property taxes.  Many UCLA Students current and alumni feel the value for these homeowners has increased due to being within the UCLA vicinity.

UCLA students feel the need for student housing is overwhelming and a need that should be a priority as they are the future.  There is also much debate as to Westwood in general with a feeling of being "rundown", no new restaurants, bars or local hangouts that the students can enjoy walking distance.  READ MORE


The proposed neighborhood council would be bounded roughly by Verteran Avenue to the west, Sunset Boulevard to the north, Hilgard Avenue to the east, and go as far south as Ohio Avenue. Courtesy of Michael Skiles. 
Google Maps

Friday, November 10, 2017

Culver City Steps major mixed use development finally breaking ground

During a time when most neighborhoods are fighting big development, Culver City Mayor welcomes this downtown construction to be known as the "Culver Steps" due to the architectural design of cascading landscaped terraces and seating down the side of the building. https://la.curbed.com/2017/11/9/16625028/culver-steps-development-downtown-renderings


Thursday, November 9, 2017

City of LA 311 smartphone app capabilities

Did you know you can download the City of LA 311 app on your smart home? Did you know all the things you can do with it? Report dumped items, graffiti, potholes, pretty much all the items that you have to report to the City and your phone will have a GPS to give the location upon sending. Thank you LEAD Officer Maria Gray of our LAPD for constantly giving great neighborhood tips.


Thursday, November 2, 2017

Los Angeles High End home Sales have slowed down, but the $1.5M range soars

The High End market in Los Angeles has slowed down even though inventory remains tight. However, the market in the the $1.5 price range continues to soar with not enough inventory to meet demand - more importantly, it marks the 21st consecutive quarter where prices have gone up.
The upper 10% of homes sales is the defined "High-end or Luxury" single-family home and according to these statistics dropped to an average price of $11.67 million in the last quarter which was a 6.7% decline.  READ MORE


Monday, September 25, 2017

Sunset Park in Santa Monica still selling over asking

In analyzing the 80 homes that sold between 7/1/16 - 6/30/17 for the Sunset Park Area in Santa Monica, 57.5% sold under 30 days and above asking at 104.79%. The median sold price was $1,723,000 which is a $1,029/sf for a 3bd/2ba 1,733sf home on a 6,623 lot.

Today, there are only 9 homes available for sale in Sunset Park and 4 are currently in escrow.  With shortage of inventory and homes selling over asking, Sunset Park Real Estate is holding strong. Link to MLS 9 homes

Visit www.lehoamiller.com for more information or click here.


#LosAngelesRealestate #HomeValues #housingmarket #markettrends #realestateforecast #housingbubble #buyersmarket #sellersmarket #santamonica #realestateinvestment #sunsetpark

Friday, September 22, 2017

Beverly Hills Trousdale Estates Real Estate value comparison from June 2016 to June 2017

In analyzing the Beverly Hills Trousdale Estates Real Estate home sales in the charts shown, the median price decreased ($850,000) at June 2017 compared to June 2016, which is nominal being only a 9% reduction.   The Interquartile Range (IQR) however, increased significantly by $2,475M being a 70% increase.  It will be interesting to see how the median price fluctuates in the upcoming future based on this high IQR.  IQR shows the variance between the 25th and 75th percentile of sold homes.

For more info visit: https://www.lehoamiller.com/los-angeles-communities/beverly-hills/
www.lehoamiller.com




#LosAngelesRealestate #HomeValues #housingmarket #markettrends #realestateforecast #housingbubble #buyersmarket #sellersmarket #beverlyhills #realestateinvestment #trousdaleestates

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

Pacific Palisades Huntington Real Estate comparison from June 2016 to June 2017

Pacific Palisades Huntington Area snapshot comparison between June 2017 and June 2016.  The Huntington median price in Pacific Palisades decreased $1,231,500 at June 2017 compared to June 2016, however, the highest sale recorded for $12,500,000 dropped off with the highest sale of $9,425,000 recorded for p/e June 2017 to adjust the difference.   The Interquartile Range (IQR) has not changed much, only a 5.91%($207,900) decline from June 2016 to June 2017, however, it is a $785,000 increase for the 75th percentile of sold homes.

For more info visit: https://www.lehoamiller.com/los-angeles-communities/pacific-palisades/

www.lehoamiller.com

#LosAngelesRealestate #HomeValues #housingmarket #markettrends #realestateforecast #housingbubble #buyersmarket #sellersmarket #pacificpalisades #realestateinvestment




Monday, September 18, 2017

Brentwood 90049 Real Estate Market Analysis for 4 quarters ending 6/30/17

Curious about the Real Estate Market in Brentwood?  Visit www.90049Brentwood.com for details on the past 4 quarters ending 6/30/17.  www.Lehoamiller.com


#realtor #realestate #realestateinvestment #luxuryrealestate #propertyvalue #homevalue #Brentwood
#90049brentwood #westlosangeles #realestateeducation #Brentwoodrealtor #Brentwoodhomes #InterquartileRange

Monday, March 6, 2017

Measure S - Vote NO and Why It Matters

From my Brokerage:

Must Read | Measure S | Vote NO and Why It Matters via Peter Loewy

A strong anti-development initiative is set to appear on tomorrow's ballot in Los Angeles. As real estate professionals, I wanted you all to be aware of this and understand why not only you should vote no, but also you must reach out to your contacts and encourage them to do the same.

What is Measure S?

Measure S is an initiative that seeks to curb development in Los Angeles. The Measure insists that the limits on development in Los Angeles are currently too lenient (if anyone has ever built in the LA area I am sure you would have strong opinion in favor of the opposite). Measure S argues that LA’s community plans that guide development throughout the city are outdated and need to be changed. It proposes a two-year moratorium on any changes to these plans, zoning changes and various other entitlement allowances that would effectively halt many projects.

But doesn’t Measure S only affect large projects?

While that is the intent. I’d urge you to look back at the 80s when Proposition U was passed. Similar to Measure S its proponents stated it would solely affect large scale community shifting projects. However, history proved that was not the case. Builders in every arena and size to this day experience the ramifications of Measure U any time they wish to build a new project. Measure S will have the same if not larger effect on our markets.

Why Should We Care?

Anti-development proposals such as this, want to stall our cities growth and encapsulate the city in the past. What cities and our industries need are innovation and speculation. While an argument can be made that too much innovation may be a bad thing (as you look out your window at whatever eye sore was recently built), Measure S is absolutely not the way to handle such issues.

Stemming growth will stagnate the real estate industry, create a housing shortage and limit the market from growth. This will have a devastating impact on future building and sales and combined with the anti-mansionization bill that just passed the City Council will have a chilling effect on development projects in LA. I highly encourage you all to get out and vote No on this proposition and to encourage your network to do the same.

The Los Angeles Times, CAR, NAR, Los Angeles City Hall and Forbes have all spoken out against the Measure – please do the same.

For more information on this look into the following articles:

Forbes | Measure S Would Grip Los Angeles In A Housing Shortage

LA Times | Making Sense of Measure S, the Latest Battle in L.A.'s Long War Over Development

Curbed LA | Meausre S: 8 Things to Know About LA's Anti-development Ballot Measure

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Understanding the Interquartile Range in Real Estate Value

There are numerous items that affect future home values, but I find that analyzing the Interquartile Range (IQR) is an immediate snapshot of value fluctuation. Monitoring the monthly Median price and the IQR will help you understand your homes current and future value.  The InterQuartile Range (IQR) shows the price variance between the 25th and 75th percentile of sold homes.  This indicates how spread out the middle 50% of sold homes are in this Area and an indicator of what the future Median value could fluctuate by.  The Average price can be a misleading number in areas where homes fluctuate by millions of dollars as 1 very high home sale would give an Average calculation that is not accurate.
Refer to the Central Brentwood chart below:  Central Brentwood Median Price for YTD 2014 was $2,350,000 and the IQR was $1,320,000.  It would be safe to assume that the Median price could go up or down based on the IQR of $1,320,000.  As you can see at YTD 2015, the median price increased by $1,057,500 to $3,407,500.

Advancing a year now to 2016, the 2015 Median price was $3,407,500 and the IQR being $2,608,750, which could be the range that the Median Price could adjust by.  2016 Median price decreased by $557,500 down to $2,850,000.

By looking at the Median basic statistics, being the Sold Price per square foot, home size and lot size; you can get a starting point to analyze home value - this is how appraisers start their valuations.  Clearly, there are other factors to consider, year home was built or year home was remodeled, upgrades, natural lighting, pool, privacy, garage scenario, floor plan, views, busy street, etc., all these items will increase or decrease value.

In the below chart for Brentwood Glen, the IQR is smaller than the above area of Central Brentwood.  A smaller IQR will usually mean a smaller increase/decrease in the median price.  Year End 2014 median price was $1,460,500 and the IQR was $351,250.  The Year End 2015 median price increased by $314,500 to $1,775,000 which was almost the entire IQR amount.   Year End 2016 median price increased by $197,358 from Year End 2015 to $1,972,358 with the IQR being $539,750.
www.Lehoamiller.com or www.90049Brentwood.com

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Brentwood Condominium 2016 Sold Condos

2016 YTD Brentwoods Condo market: Compare Central Brentwood to South Brentwood. Dividing road is San Vicente Blvd. Direct link to this subpage is: http://www.lehoamiller.com/brentwoo…/brentwood-condominiums/

Visit www.90049Brentwood.com or www.lehoamiller.com


Brentwood Condominium 2016 Sold Condos
#realtor #realestate #realestateinvestment #luxuryrealestate #propertyvalue #homevalue #Brentwood #90049brentwood #westlosangeles #realestateeducation #Brentwoodrealtor #SouthBrentwood #Brentwoodhomes #brentwoodcondo #condominium

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

South and Central Brentwood Year End Real Estate Home Sale Comparison

Central Brentwoods median price decreased at YTD 12/31/16 compared to YTD 12/31/15 by ($557,500), however, keep in mind that 27 homes sold in 2016 versus only 18 in 2015. 2016 sales include 8 homes that were newer builds from 2013-2016, while 2015 only had 2 new 2015 built homes. 2016 did increase $500K compared to 2014.
Direct link to this subpage:
Compare this to South Brentwoods median price which was $2,262,500 at YTD Dec 2016 and reduced by 23% compared to YTD Dec 2015. However, the median square feet adjusted by 1,284sf. From 3,206sf in 2015 to 1,922sf in 2016 – this had to do with newer, bigger homes built in 2015.
Direct link to this subpage:

Visit www.lehoamiller.com or www.90049brentwood.com for market statistics on other areas.

#realtor #realestate#realestateinvestment #luxuryrealestate#propertyvalue #homevalue #Brentwood #90049brentwood#bundycanyon #westlosangeles#realestateeducation #Brentwoodrealtor#SouthBrentwood #Brentwoodhomes

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

To McMansion or Not? Developer Bash or Not?

On Wednesday, January 18, 2017, the City of Los Angeles will hold a special meeting to discuss "Planning and Land Use" by the Management Committee.

For all of us in Real Estate or who have an interest, these meetings have been ongoing for the past few years.  There were moratoriums put in place a few years ago during an emergency meeting that the City called upon to immediately halt permits to be issued and immediate limitations for home building provisions.

There have been special zones throughout Los Angeles that have different criteria than the rest of the County based upon City Officials deeming too much development had taken place.

There are two sides to this issue and very heated - almost like our last Presidential Race, and very difficult to persuade one side to see the other.

On a homeowners side; there are two positions.  One side doesn't want to see huge homes being built next to their smaller home and dwarfing them - hence the McMansion title came to be.  There are also those who may not own, but concerned about the environment impact with these huge builds and how the neighborhoods become disproportioned. 

The other homeowner side is absolutely furious that they may have spent most of their lives saving to purchase land in Los Angeles and not sure what they want to alter now, however, adamantly do not want the government involved in advising what they can or can not do with their incredibly expensive property.  Some may wish in the future to build on if their family expands or if an elderly relative needs to come reside - all these items which would are being halted by the City.

Then there are the Developers, they specifically purchase a property to rehab and flip for a profit.  It is in their best interest to build as big as possible as the price per square foot is what makes the bottom line look good.  

Now before we all go Developer bashing - which is mainly what has occurred, can we all stop for a moment and think back to the days when California's Real Estate had tanked?  We all know those days, Countrywide was stationed here in Los Angeles County and giving subprime loans to anyone with a high FICO score and a pulse rate and eventually prosecuted by California's Attorney General in 2008.  Many banks followed in this subprime fashion and it was a game of musical chairs awaiting the day that Real Estate stopped doubling each year until the foreclosures would then take place.

We loved the Real Estate Developers back in those years.  They came in with cash, bought up old properties and either rehabbed or basically built new.  They were a big boost to property values and bringing in higher comps thus making our property values rise up.  They brought jobs and revenue for the City which was desperately needed.

Today, however, there is a backlash between individuals and Developers as some neighborhoods are losing their "neighborhood" look with too many huge out of place homes on small lots.  On the flip side, there are some individuals who can not afford to both purchase a home or lot and then be able to rehab it.  Two separate loan items here - one is to purchase the property, then to qualify for a construction loan to rehab and the time it takes.  These individuals looking to buy a new home are very appreciative of the Developers. 

But hold on here, the City approved those big McMansions back then when we needed the revenue.  No developer could build without an approved permit being issued and going through plan check.  This can be easily a 3 month minimum process for heavy remodeling.  Now the same City Officials are limiting the build, which undoubtedly came from Citizen pressure.   

Where we stand today is some individuals are not happy that the City is unilaterally making decisions without a vote being put to the people on one of the biggest Assets some individuals own.   So whether you Agree or Disagree, what is important is to show up at the meeting or voice your opinion to your local Congressmen.



SPECIAL MEETING, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

Wednesday, January 18, 2017


The meeting is scheduled to begin at 3:30 p.m. in the John Ferraro Council Chamber (Room 340) of Los Angeles City Hall, 200 N Spring St, Los Angeles, CA 90012.


Negative Declaration and related California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings, report from the City Attorney and draft Ordinance relative to amending Sections 12.03, 12.07, 12.07.01, 12.07.1, 12.08, 12.21, 12.23, and 12.28 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish new regulations for all single-family residential zoned properties including RA, RE, RS and R1 citywide, updating the existing Baseline Mansionization Ordinance and Baseline Hillside Ordinance provisions relating to the size and bulk of new single-family residences and modifying grading provisions for single-family lots in designated Hillside areas.
http://ens.lacity.org/clk/committeeagend/clkcommitteeagend26108827_01182017.html

www.lehoamiller.com
www.90049Brentwood.com

#McMansion #HomeValue #PropertyInvestment